David Schnuckel Uses His Words

41st Annual Glass Art Society Conference Journal

   

           I have been incredibly humbled and appreciative to receive an invitation to speak at the 41st Annual GAS Conference this year…especially in considering the fact that I am a fairly unrecognizable member of the international glass community.  With this in mind, I used the opportunity to introduce myself, my work, my methods of making, and the ideas that motivate what I do and how I go about doing it within the presentation.

            The nature of my work is very much rooted in narrative and its content always involves or revolves around a highly abstracted and fictitious rendering of some kind of observation of my many human shortcomings.  I wanted to use this presentation to address my personal interests in utilizing glass, imagery, and the written word within a sculptural context in relation to my work.  In referencing historical glass, contemporary craft, and popular culture I discussed the relevance of these sources to the development of the ideas and processes that guide my practice.  I also discussed my approach towards the narrative aspect of the work in relation to my interests in the essence of human fallibility, the human response to personal conflict, and the virtues within struggle, humility, and failure… discomforting factors that, whether we like it or not, allow us to continually redefine ourselves and, therefore, serve as highly transformative opportunities.

             As a child, I was a shy and awkward boy who took interest and comfort in the fictional glories of favorite super heroes within comic books and animated television.  At the time, I believe the attraction was consciously upon the emphasis on color, simplistic shapes, and fantastical sequencing of both action and suspense.  However, now in hindsight, I believe there was a subconscious response to the super hero as a model of the ideal…a being of thoroughly flawless characteristics physically, emotionally, intellectually, and morally.  My boyish aspirations of developing into an equally perfect being dissolved gradually year by year as maturity and experience revealed the fact that being human is actually quite the opposite of what I had once believed.  I can’t say that I take pleasure in my inadequacies and occasional lapse in judgment, but I do acknowledge significance within it.  Comic book storylines have always been structured around the presence of conflict - portrayed traditionally between physical engagement between the hero and his or her nemesis.  Although this aspect of comic books holds current contemporary relevance politically and socially, I find the concept of struggle to be of great fascination regarding an individual’s perspective of the self.

            Since my youth I have come to recognize that comic books had, undoubtedly, left a tremendous impression upon me.  They are responsible for my interest in images and drawing.  They are responsible for my interest in words and writing.  They are responsible for my value for imagination and making.  But, most importantly, they are responsible for laying the conceptual foundation with which I’ve built my artistic development upon.  Initially, the superhero comic character was adopted as a personal and legitimate catalyst for change.  However, the ideals represented within traditional heroic fantasy that I had been inspired by during my adolescence do not translate well during such an antiheroic age that we live in at present. Aside from their visual potency, comic books have served as a personally relevant medium that examines difficult issues simply in the way in which the stories are canonically structured. These elements of confronting personal conflict, questioning identity, and of undergoing radical transformations are the thematic pillars to every comic book character narrative.  They also happen to be points of interest that motivate the basis of my work.

             I’ve always taken special interest in the metaphorical properties of specific glass objects or processes of glass working in particular eras of glass history that were commonly associated with hosting graphic content – relishing not only in their unspoken poetic potential as objects commonly associated with pictorially ornamented glass, but of the conceptual relevance of translating their significance into a modern-day formal vehicle of self-expression from the perspective of a young man of American descent.  In drawing from the goblet, the bottle, and glass painted portraiture, I spoke in the presentation of how I utilized these historical instances as platforms – or formal motifs – with which to speak from with personally applied narrative content.

            The work involving the goblet motif was an effort to create a modern day rendition in glass of everything I was attracted to with the black-figure painted pottery of ancient Greece.  In acknowledging the Greek strict obedience to mathematically based structure of form and lustful aesthetic to craftsmanship, I drew a connection to a shared virtue in the making and prestige of European cup making of the 17th to 19th century.  The goblet has primarily been personally considered as an object of metaphorical purpose - a luxurious form to commemorate particular individuals or events by means of imagery and/or text applied upon or into its surface.  With that in mind, I pulled inspiration from the mythical narratives upon the ancient Greek pottery and created proportionally enhanced goblet forms to host fictitiously adapted narratives inspired by my own human shortcomings.  In using the graphic stylings of the comic book format and look I felt that this particular mode of present day storytelling was a fitting extension of Greek lore; that super hero comics in particular serve us as a contemporary society as modern day mythology.  The attraction to the Greek value in the tragic hero also serves as an impetus in what motivates the content of my narratives: protagonists destined to “battle” - and ultimately lose to - unforeseen forces of conflict.  I acknowledge this to be an odd fascination, but personally meaningful, nonetheless. 

              The materials used to apply graphics are selected to be intentionally primitive and non-traditional.  In using spray paint, Sharpies, and children’s Crayola markers the motive is to find the extraordinary potential within very ordinary means of self-expression…to make these materials “pass” in a visually glorious manner.  This is a constant consideration within how I go about my work as an attempt to externally implement the process of radical transformation…of hoping to find my own capacity of substantiality as a common individual by uncovering the unique and unforeseen potential of the most unsung of mark-making tools.

            In speaking of things uncelebrated, another body of work was again inspired by a significant object of glass history commonly associated with hosting a variety of images and text upon its surface.  However, an object also known for it’s humble simplicity as opposed to the goblet’s opulent demeanor.  The hand-made bottle of colonial America was quickly and crudely made…a no-nonsense approach to its production, therefore, leading towards its rough and tumble aesthetic.  Yet, for all of its faults and faux pas – it’s thickness, it’s wonky stature, it’s loose posturing, the blemished glass it was blown with – these trademark foibles of the colonial bottle had introduced me to the idea of integrating a bit of humanity into how I worked with glass.  Ultimately it inspired me to begin “undoing” my obedience to symmetry. 

             A second consideration of the work involving the bottle motif was in regards to its para-function: it’s ability to undergo a great variety of identities and serve many different purposes far beyond its initial function of holding fluid.  Once its contents are gone, the bottle essentially serves its owner of no importance.  Although coming across as a simple and lowbrow poster child in the archive of objects commonly associated with glass, I find the bottle to be a highly iconic visual motif – especially once emptied and considered “useless.”  In fact, the bottle is at its poetic best once its initial purpose has been served.  Under this light, the bottle serves as an ordinary thing capable of serving tremendously extraordinary and unforeseen purposes due to functional reinvention under peculiar circumstances (as seen by the Molotov cocktail) or by metaphorical association (as represented by the hopelessness of an emptied and strewn brown-bagger).  This body of work was pursued under a variety of intentions.  The most important, however, was to establish a reciprocal dependency between form and imagery in accordance to the content of a piece, to pursue the application of the graphic material in a way that utilized the physical/visual properties unique to glass, and of doing all of this in service to ideas based on the callused grandeur of being human.

            The third body of work that I discussed was a radical deviation from the previous two.  Putting blown form to the side, my interests in using graphics led to questioning how I could use imagery and the written word within more of a sculptural context; as abstracted visual components that contribute to a bigger idea as opposed to drawing upon the legacy of vessel surface ornamentation.  In capitalizing on my value for doing a lot with a little even further, I wanted to compose a body of work that thrived on resurrecting discarded float glass and other abandoned materials. 

            In using ink, pencil, and enamels I am thinking about a variety of new considerations within this work: the transparent nature of glass and how I could literally and figuratively layer information, the role a flat image could have in space, the relationship between materials, the quality of the marks being made, and the significance of even removing them and what that implies in some accounts. 

          All of this “flat” work is, most importantly, inspired by the idea of reinterpreting the conventions of glass painting and framed portraiture.  In considering the frame as a housing unit of portraiture in general I use it as a symbol for order and pursue this work with the idea of playing against this structure in a variety of ways.  Also, this body of work is pursued with a desire to add an ironic twist to the idea of a portrait as serving as the rendering of one’s likeness and approaching this abstractedly – not interested in portraying how one looks, but how one is.  Actually, I should clarify that the work is exclusively in regard to myself…perpetually learning even still who I am and how I operate and trying to assemble some sort of meaning out of it all.

            The nature of my work has always been highly introspective.  Although seemingly stable and confident, I am often fascinated by my own faults and failures that often lend to an overwhelming sense of personal uncertainty and insecurity.  For me, making is an activity with which I can impose order upon my mental and emotional processes and find a sense of meaning amidst the occasional clutter of doubt and disappointment.  I don’t usually intend to make statements with my work, but I will admit that I do make testimonial confessions of a certain callused grandeur in being human.  Whether or not this remains a significant aspect of my future work, I think it is a natural thing for one to take a curious interest in that which distinguishes him or herself as an individual.  Ultimately, I will always be drawn to the human response to personal conflict …not necessarily because I romanticize about tragedy, but because there is an ironic beauty within the purpose of experiencing struggle, humility, and defeat.  Whether we like it or not, these discomforting factors allow us to continually redefine ourselves and, therefore, serve as highly transformative opportunities.  There are pluses to all of our minuses.

            I am so incredibly happy to have had the opportunity to introduce myself to the international community within my presentation at the 41st annual GAS Conference.  Of course, there is so much more I wanted to share within my lecture that time just wouldn’t allow.  Similarly, there is still so much more I’d like to convey through this essay that the spatial guidelines of the GAS Journal cannot permit either.  As a result, I encourage anybody who’s interested to visit my website at davidschnuckel.com.  It is there that one can further investigate my work and find links that lead to sites which host various writing about it.

UrbanGlass Hot Glass Sheet: 3 Questions

Shortly after the exhibition had opened in the Robert Madsen Gallery this past December I was contacted by Andrew Page, the Editor of GLASS: The UrbanGlass Quarterly.  He was wondering if I wanted to participate in the reoccuring “3 Questions” segment of the magazine’s accompanying blog: the UrbanGlass Hot Glass Sheet.  I, of course, was more than happy to take part…and that’s incredibly understated.  I’ve always been a fan of the segment, as well as those who had participated before me (and after).  

Below lies the content of what was posted just before the Holiday season of 2011 a few days after the opening reception of “Parenthetical Admission (Things Eventually Recognized After the Fact…)” in Seattle.  The accompanying images are different than what was originally posted in the Hot Glass Sheet, but a piece belonging to the body of work I am speaking to in the interview, nonetheless.  

GLASS: What are you working on?

David Schnuckel: I’m currently expanding upon a body of work I started about two years ago comprised mostly of found and altered materials with an effort to reinterpret the traditional practice of painted portraiture.  My interest in using glass over the past several years had always been in drawing from its rich history in pictorial application and this current body of work still takes root in that. However, my current efforts are a dramatic deviation from previous work in that I’ve put blown-glass form to the side, questioning how I can use imagery and the written word as abstracted, visual components within a sculptural context as opposed to narrative surface ornamentation. Also, without access to the kind of glass facilities I rely on to compose the previous work I’ve been using the idea of “limitation” to my advantage by translating the ideas and interests that motivated the blown work into new methods of creative introspection.

Due to a childhood admiration of comic books, I’ve always been drawn to the idea of an average being undergoing some sort of unforeseen and scientifically fictional mishap, becoming, then, something far more superior than that character had ever expected. The recent work is driven by the idea of implementing a similar kind of radical transformation by resurrecting discarded glass, paper, fabric, wood, and twine into visually loaded components of renewed purpose with a variety of mark-making tools including ink, pencil, stitching, and enamels. I love the idea of uncovering the extraordinary potential of these once “useless” items mostly due to the fact that I can humanly relate to that aspiration. I’m also thinking about a variety of new considerations within this work: the ability to both literally and figuratively layer information due to the transparency of glass, the role a flat image has in space, the relationship between materials, the quality of the marks being made, and the significance of even removing them and what that implies in some accounts.

By adapting the idea of portraiture as a practice of rendering one’s likeness pictorially, the content of the current work is driven by depicting observations of my own character flaws and shortcomings through abstracted narratives involving pop-based iconography and text. I’m still drawn to issues regarding the human response to personal conflict and what I’ve been recently working on is perhaps my most genuine effort to explore this attraction to the ironic beauty within struggle, humility, and failure thus far.  Whether we like it or not, these discomforting factors allow us to continually redefine ourselves and, therefore, serve as highly transformative opportunities. Personal difficulty is a thing that seems hard for people to embrace, let alone acknowledge.  For me, it’s a goldmine of conceptual material to work with as an artist…

GLASS: What artwork have you seen recently that inspired you and got you thinking about your own work?

David: I’ve been working hard over the past couple of years to undo everything that has become standard in my studio practice…and I think the current work reflects that.  I am an individual that habitually thrives on order, balance, strategy, and logic that, in turn, has affected my aesthetic and conceptual sensibility.  As a result, I’ve been really adamant about paying attention to artists that incorporate a vigorously poignant use of imagery, text, and/or material sensibility to help aid in reinventing myself…

I’ve always been drawn to the vulnerable and expressive narratives composed by British artist Grayson Perry upon the surfaces of his ceramic vessels…who also has been translating these ideas into complicated, labor intensive tapestries these days, too. In speaking about textiles, Darrel Morris is an artist who uses needle-work to compose pictorial storyboards of compelling adaptations of personal experiences on cloth that are ambiguous enough to allow anybody to relate to. I also look to Gwen Hedley who shares my interest in transforming the mundane into the meaningful by finding discarded things and uses fabric and paper along with them to assemble poetic, personal works that also incorporate stitched imagery and written word.  Along the lines of making with found objects, I also draw inspiration from John Drury and Robbie Miller (as the CUD collaborative team) who harvest an outsider’s approach to self-expression by resurrecting discarded glass and painting on it with a tenacious and uninhibited vitality. Dana Zámečniková’s sculptural take on glass and imagery is also a contributing factor towards my current work: building up layers of pictorial information between laminated slabs of float glass and, in some pieces, drawing from the idea of having physical elements from within a fictitious space penetrate into real space.  I also love the ambiguous, quirky exchange between the delightfully weird painted images of Friese Undine and the titles of the work (which sometimes find their way cleverly within the piece itself). It reminds me of the grim, satirical spirit of some of the interplay between title and image as seen in Francisco De Goya’s “Disasters of War” series of prints…really graphic etchings representing his brokenness by national tragedy during the French infiltration of Spain in the early 19th century.  Tony Fitzpatrick is another artist working somewhat “flat” in that he creates open-ended biographical collages of found objects around his native Chicago area that relate to my interest of using seemingly simple components to speak towards a narratively complicated whole.

There are many individuals that I could cite as inspirational sources of reference, but I know that space is limited.  I also haven’t addressed creative phenomena that have influenced my thinking about my work: the significance of lowbrow, immediate modes of self-expression such as bathroom-stall art and tagging; the quick wit and guerilla visual tactics of various methods of street art; the untrained and genuine touch of outsider art.  Even though my primary medium as an artist is within glass, there is a lot of work outside of the contemporary glass and craft field at large that has been within my consideration…

GLASS: Where is it possible to see your work on exhibit?                                                    

David: At the moment I have new work showing at the Robert Madsen Gallery in Seattle, Washington.  The exhibition is called “Parenthetical Admission (Things Eventually Recognized After the Fact…)” and it’s up until Friday, January 6th.  I also have a website at davidschnuckel.com that hosts more images of work and links to other sites that feature my writing about it.

“Waiting in the Wings (The Sound Those Secrets Make…)”

Found and Altered Materials

H: 72”, W: 300”, D: 48”

2010


Parenthetical Admission (Things Eventually Recognized After the Fact…) is an exhibition of work that is inspired by the essence of human fallibility, thriving on peronsal limitation, and pursuing a sense of glory within the inglorious qualities of my own faults and failures.  The work within Parenthetical Admission is a reevaluation of personal mishap and misjudgment in finding discarded, flawed sheet glass (as well as other found materials) with the intention to resurrect its previous uselessness into becoming painted components of renewed vitality and purpose.  The premise of the work is of finding the extraordinary potential within what is often overlooked and considered of little to no value; of reflecting upon and reconsidering the possible significance of things that were previously regarded as meaningless.  As a result, Parenthetical Admission is a conscious effort to piece together seemingly defected fragments in order to compose a beautifully callused and genuine whole.


Parenthetical Admission (Things Eventually Recognized After the Fact…) is an exhibition of work that is inspired by the essence of human fallibility, thriving on peronsal limitation, and pursuing a sense of glory within the inglorious qualities of my own faults and failures.  The work within Parenthetical Admission is a reevaluation of personal mishap and misjudgment in finding discarded, flawed sheet glass (as well as other found materials) with the intention to resurrect its previous uselessness into becoming painted components of renewed vitality and purpose.  The premise of the work is of finding the extraordinary potential within what is often overlooked and considered of little to no value; of reflecting upon and reconsidering the possible significance of things that were previously regarded as meaningless.  As a result, Parenthetical Admission is a conscious effort to piece together seemingly defected fragments in order to compose a beautifully callused and genuine whole.

On Saturday, December 10 from 5:30 to 9 pm I will have an exhibition at the Robert Madsen Gallery in Seattle’s Ballard district!  

Parenthetical Admission (Things Eventually Recognized After the Fact…) features new work comprised of found and altered materials to reinterpret the traditional practice of painted portraiture by utilizing glass, imagery, and the written word within a sculptural context.  

On Saturday, December 10 from 5:30 to 9 pm I will have an exhibition at the Robert Madsen Gallery in Seattle’s Ballard district!  

Parenthetical Admission (Things Eventually Recognized After the Fact…) features new work comprised of found and altered materials to reinterpret the traditional practice of painted portraiture by utilizing glass, imagery, and the written word within a sculptural context.  

Being and Essence

During the summer of 2010 I had taken a course at the Pilchuck Glass School and, as per tradition, each session hosts a Student Auction to help raise funds from participating members on campus in support of the school.  In realizing that I didn’t have a “thing” to donate, I was more than happy to donate a service to the cause: a written analysis on the winning bidder’s work.  My item was on the market within the silent auction and a student named Polly Brumder had squeezed in the last and winning bid.  Afterwards we had talked about the nature of her work and I grabbed a few images of hers to take back home with me at the end of the session to base her analysis on.  After touching down back in upstate New York it was nearly August and I was scrambling to find a new apartment before my new position at RIT began towards the end of the month.  

I landed a really great space along the lively Park Avenue area and spent a good two or three hot, August evenings working out something for Polly, knowing full well that school would take all my attention away in a couple of short weeks.  My windows were open, my box-fan was on as high as it could go, and I could hear the faux-fraternity household (and their rowdy friends) next door enjoying the last of their Summer break with a gluttony of booze and bad Raggae.  As they were partying with beer, I was partying with words.  Below is what I saw in Polly’s work…


Being and Essence:

Figuratively Exploring Human Substantiality


       

      When viewing the work of Polly Brumder one is reminded of the visual lyricism in the human form – not to mention the poetic nature of being human, in general.  There is an obvious, unique, and disappointing disconnect within the current American perception of the physical self that truly distinguishes contemporary society’s consideration of the body apart from any other - regardless of place or era.  In a culture where our ambitions are towards a misdirected idea of perfection and an intolerable expectation for results to be immediate, our perceptions upon the body are mostly fixated in its appearance - leading us to regard it in a highly superficial manner.  Brumder’s value in the human figure indicates quite the opposite.   As a sculptor who possesses a broad understanding of materials and processes, she creates work to render the harmony, elegance, and sincerity of the human form.

      The human figure has been a motif within contemporary painting and sculpture to address provocative issues regarding gender, individualism, identity, and sexuality.  For Brumder, though, the figure is mostly representational - a formal motif that retains a strong reference to what we most readily associate with the real world…ourselves.  She does not take poetic license with the proportional ratios of her subject’s anatomical structure.  Rather, she pursues the truest representation of her subjects with a sculptor’s determined pursuit of authenticity - not only in how her subjects look, but what their physicality says about who they might be.  Brumder is an observer and her work is a mimesis of the multi-faceted capabilities of the human spirit.

      As a practicing artist it is apparent that Brumder is prolific, to say the least.  Her thumbs are in several pies as far as media goes, but she is noticeably more inclined to pursue the figure in clay, metal, and glass…hard, dense materials that are handled in a very attentive and concerted manner.  Her ability to handle her materials - of giving specific shape to what was originally lifeless, raw substance – indicates a very tender intent to not only make something out of nothing, but to coax the very extraordinary potential of her vision out of inanimate matter. At an immediate glance, one is moved by Brumder’s work first and foremost by her crafting…and that which inspires her is contagious, for we as viewers catch wind of that raw emotion and it begins to make us want to connect with someone we’ve never met…or may have never even existed.

      Humans react to a variety of stimuli and, in turn, Brumder’s work is a reaction to the emotional response of bodily gesture. Her figures can register a likeness, but they can also serve as a vehicle for conveying a narrative or expressing emotion…rendering the real while simultaneously provoking the absolute. Brumder seems to be a mix between a realist and a sensationalist.  Formally, she renders her subjects as truthfully as she can, yet the poses and facial expressions of them are extraordinarily stirring.  No matter how eccentric or stoic her subjects actually pose their self to be Brumder has a knack in portraying humanity at its most dramatic.  Her work isn’t necessarily just about the individual, but in the idea about the shared experience of being human, speaking indirectly about character, states of behavior, and sentiment more than anything else.

      There is an obvious history of busts and figure portrayal as being a practice of commemoration – of preserving the essence of somebody’s character as an eternal reminder of his or her distinguishable qualities.  Not just in how one might look, but also in reflecting how he or she was wired internally.  Works such as these instill an essence of immortality even though the subjects themselves are not, allowing the viewer to identify with unfamiliar company.  Especially long after his or her passing.  Two of Brumder’s works that speak about this emotional connect to foreign characters are “Pensive Male” and “Wandering Female” (author’s attempt at titling for reader’s reference).

      In “Pensive Male” the viewer comes across a bust of a young man who carries a small beard and has his long hair tied tightly up in a bun.  He stares off seriously in to the distance, absorbed in thought, his gaze contemplative, preoccupied, and ominous.  Although without limbs or body the viewer can detect his seriousness sans bodily gesture.  His piercing eyes, slightly furrowed brow, and demeanor are clear enough indication of his emotional “stance.”  There is a tension that instills the viewer with a sense of restraint - a hushed impulse to respect the bust’s contemplation and also an intrigue as to what he’s considering.  In this case, Brumder not only sculpts an identifiably pondering young man, but does so in a way that fills the viewer with a sense of inferiority - as if we are to wait for his command or final judgment.  The absence of the body also lends towards the viewer’s curious fixation on who “Pensive Male” is rather than what he’s doing; the head as a physical vehicle for thought, a carrier of ideas, secrets, curiosities, and speculation.  The source of his preoccupation is undeterminable, but his facial expression is one we can all relate to and, curiously enough, mimic unconsciously while viewing.

      A second example of how Brumder elicits human emotion is through bodily gesture.  “Female Wanderer” is a bronze sculpture of a young woman standing alone with her arms held to the level of her chest, palms turned upward.  In her open hands are three delicate entities seemingly organic in nature.  They balance steadily in her palms, yet precariously enough to elicit a sense of them being light and airy…so much so that it causes the viewer to regulate his or her breathing to not disrupt the moment.  The figure’s head is turned away from the viewer, her attention stirred by something from behind.  Whether real or imagined by her, this ambiguous presence that she seems to be fixated with holds our attention, too.  The moment she seems to be having with the small company within her hands appears to be threatened and we, too, share her sense of silent alarm.

      The way in which “Wandering Female” is standing       makes a certain formal connection with the small           company within her hands.  She stands securely, as if stopping for a moment during a casual walkabout, perhaps investigating a foreign environment and mystified by her surroundings.  There is loveliness to her posture, a gentle demeanor in how her arms are positioned, and femininity in how she holds her body.  She personifies the idea of grace and emotes a similar delicacy as the creatures in her hands do.  Both subjects are equally vulnerable and, as viewers, we assume a hushed demeanor as we approach them.  Wanting to indicate our harmlessness, we are physically sensitive of startling these sculptures as we approach the piece, questioning why we feel compelled to come within close proximity to her in the first place.  Through facial expression and bodily gesture, Brumder’s work with the figure enables us to connect with the many facets of our own humanity simply in allowing us to visually engage the range of things we’ve only experienced through feeling.

       Aside from Brumder’s regard for the emotional dynamic of the figure’s “dramatic appearance” I also take interest in her dabbling in ideas based on the “dramatic change” of the materiality of her work, too.   It is an observation upon the processes involved in some of her studio practice - in how the figure is made in one material, has its likeness molded, and then translated into an entirely different version of itself within another material.  In “Upwards” a nude female is sculpted in clay from the waist up.  Her hands are to the front of her torso, turned slightly upwards and closely placed by her navel…as if holding an invisible bundle of something.  Her head is sharply directed upwards, eyes closed, long hair falling victim to gravity and dangling down to the small of her back.  There is a sense of motion to the piece… a vertical thrust of the woman’s body as if she were submerged in a pool of water and pushed herself through the surface with a sense of urgency, gasping for a breath of air.

       The clay study of this form is colorless, yet fleshy.  It has a shine to it that not only contributes to the “breaking the water’s surface” interpretation, but also elicits vitality from the woman…a figurative and literal sparkle of liveliness.  The surface of the form is very painterly.  Clay is applied, carved, and pushed around by hand leaving “brush strokes” of its tooling.  This also contributes to her liveliness in that the pattern of the clay’s motion is ambulant, not confined to any fixed location upon her body.  Although a study in progress, the woman in “Upwards” in clay projects a warmth and vivacious energy simply due to the visual characteristics of the material with which it is made with.

       A second version of the woman is also seen in cast glass.  Although there are subtle formal differences between the two (posturing of the neck, arching of the back, more realistic detailing of features…) they are essentially the same woman.  Her build is dense and reads visually anchored by her own heft.  The colors applied act as an opaque skin allowing light only to reflect upon the woman’s surface, revealing it to be matte and rough.  It already visually feels heavy, but the color palette used upon the body is primarily covered with melancholic greens, accented here and there with fainted reds and oranges…all further contributing to a very dour regard of the woman’s physical situation.  Although more anatomically realistic, the glass rendition of “Upwards” is much more spiritually vacant…lifeless both figuratively and literally.  Its stiffness, eerie color scheme, and less dramatic gesturing all lead to interpreting her physicality as something tragic: a hoisted carcass as apposed to her animated self in clay who jolts with immediacy towards a place above her.  This is not to say that one version of “Upwards” is better than the other, but that the woman depicted in each piece is a significantly different version of her.  In this case, Brumder’s work also begins to direct the viewer to think about personal transformation, identity, and of language lost or gained when transferring the same form from one material to another.

      Although Brumder’s sculptures of posed nudes and busts are skillfully executed, I find the impulse to render the human form to be in itself of interest.  Whether created in view of a live model, an image, or from the mind’s eye I interpret her inclination to recreate the physical liking of the human subject as an effort to give life to inanimate things.  It’s almost a sense of creationism where something is made from nothing - form lending way to motion, surface lending way to character, and gesture lending way to spirit. Resilient substances worked and moved with a keen eye and steady hand to evoke emotional adaptations of facial and bodily gestures that extract a sense of softness and being.  Although literally lifeless, Brumder can easily be said to transform cold materials into figurative adaptations of humanity at its poetic best.  There is a power within the sculpture of Polly Brumder that not only connects the viewer to the subject, but also indirectly connects the viewer unto him or herself.  People, in general, inspire us and their story naturally informs us of our own…not only in who we are, but whom we want to, and potentially could, be.

(Source: artsresource.org)

The Allure of the Improbable

In late 2008 I had happily flown to Seoul, South Korea to attend an opening of an exhibition at Gallery Sklo that I was participating in…which was beautiful.  While visiting I had the good fortune of being accompanied by a colleague from graduate school, Eunsuh Choi, who was kind enough to be my guide, chauffer, and translator during the visit.  She was such a great host I couldn’t help but agree to write a brief article on her behalf as part of the visa application process to extend her stay in the States.  Eventually it was published to my surprise in the February 2010 issue of ‘Glaushaus’, a bilingual international magazine addressing issues related to studio glass published in Germany and distributed on a quarterly basis.  Below is a short analysis of her work at the time that was within the issue…

The Allure of the Improbable: 

Examining the Contemplative Qualities Within the Work of Eunsuh Choi

      One of the characteristics that make the human experience such a unique one is that we all share a longing for personal enrichment. The search for individual fulfillment is a deep-seeded pursuit within all of us and is not only approached in a variety of ways, but is also a pursuit of various means of accomplishment. No matter how significant or superficial one’s ambition might be, it is the presence of aspiration that beckons us as humans to somehow claim or further carve out our own understanding of ourselves within our lifetime. Although there is much attention and sensitivity towards the things that make us as humans very different from one another, there is an undeniable connection amidst all of us in that we all desire something better for ourselves. This impulse is the impetus within the sculptural work of Eunsuh Choi, work that visually communicates the spiritual essence of human ambition.

      Choi is an artist that uses the medium of flameworked glass to create objects and installations composed of intricately fused glass threads. Sitting diligently behind a small open-flamed torch, she bends and joins thinner-than-pencil glass rods in a complex arrangement. It is an extraordinarily systematic structure no matter how organic or symmetrical the shape of her work takes. For instance, imagine a cube that is structured internally by many, many individual segments of noodle-esque rods, yet still composed within a perfect hexahedron. This is a defining characteristic of Choi’s work: clean and flawlessly executed shapes of seemingly simplistic form, but only reading as such by the clean craftsmanship of such a complex interworking. The viewer can’t help but be stunned by such a densely chaotic matrix within such a coherent and identifiable template…a visually stunning display of technical virtuosity that not only speaks of Choi’s understanding of the material, but also in the way in which it allows her to construct meaning within her making.

      The structures that she creates within her recent work resemble objects that the viewer is familiar with and comes across within daily living. Ladders, stairs, trees and even hybrids of the three previous things appear as reoccurring formal motifs. Seemingly common objects that withhold a common bond in that they are all metaphors for ascension.

      Objects like ladders and stairs are man-made tools used to assist or aid an individual to physically raise somebody to a higher level…to reach a destination that one would be incapable of doing without such a device. There is a certain poetry spoken when making work of this nature - and even with this material - in the manner that Choi uses glass. These objects are associated with all things dense and structurally sound whereas Choi’s renditions are light and airy…almost celestial. The gloss and glisten that is reflected from the glass construction, coupled with the suspension of such pieces, further imply a spiritual or apparitional quality. It is as if these pieces were composed of light and were revealing themselves unto the viewer as a holy vision, indicating one towards a direction above and beyond where they stand. In this work, Choi is attempting to create a physical representation of what it feels like to have a personal moment of revelation when standing in the presence of the actual piece. The moment feels as if something sacred is taking place as the viewer visualizes him or herself climbing the delicate structure in an equally delicate manner…transcending one’s self beyond the realm of physical possibility. Although beautiful looking objects, there is an allure to these pieces that similarly surpasses their physicality in that the viewer not only becomes overwhelmed by what they see, but, more importantly, in what they sense internally.

      Choi also uses the metaphorical qualities of organic structures within the natural world as motifs for ascension. In a much more lively and asymmetrical composition, she uses a similarly delicate assemblage of glass rods to create renditions of a tree form. Although the tree withholds many sacred and symbolic connotations, it is apparent that Choi is interested in using it to make a metaphorical connection to the spirit of human aspiration. Unlike the stairs and the ladder, the tree is an object that lives and breathes, has the capability of growing and is equally capable of dying. It is a mortal entity in itself and is a thing that bears many human qualities, but it seems that it’s potential for escalation could be of Choi’s main interest. Although all trees start as a seedling, it takes a certain kind of environment and a certain set of circumstances for that seed to gradually grow into its full potential as a tall, budding and healthy tree. There is a unique parallel between the development of any given tree and the human spirit in that there is no redundancy amidst their like kind in how either two things develop or what it is they develop into. Nor is there a guarantee that either thing will develop into their full potential. The pieces that Choi creates under the influence of the natural world read as individual narratives, perhaps even as portraitures of certain individuals or certain moments of her own personal growth. Nevertheless, she uses the malleable qualities of glass to bend and curve the material into frozen renderings of limbs and branches that ethereally reach toward some invisible goal above them. Some of the more interesting pieces are those in which she integrates the organic motion of the limbs with the stoic stature of the ladder form. Works such as these raise questions about pursuing the ideal as opposed to accepting what is probable, what determines one’s identity, and issues regarding fatalism versus free-will…philosophical contrasts that perhaps the artist investigates within her work as a result of her sculptural studies under both Korean and American schools of thought.

      However, there is evidence of Choi’s awareness of human fallibility, fault, and error within our pursuit for greatness. Amidst her clear glass structures are often small inclusions or topical treatments that elicit a withering or rotted presence. These elements clash with the glassy surface of the structure and act as either a visual distraction from the upward motion of the form’s progress or a rotten spot to designate the origin of ill-growth. Gradually, these inserts change color as their verticality enhances, progressively obtaining richer hues of precious metals as it reaches the very top of the piece. It’s almost as if these inclusions serve as the piece’s spirit and increases in value as the clear “body” of the piece physically rises to its maximum potential.

      The recent work of Eunsuh Choi carries a quiet, meditative tone that lends heavily towards its spiritual emphasis. It’s the kind of work that viewers bask in rather than investigate on behalf of its celestial allure and its ability to evoke introspection. It wouldn’t be accurate to consider Choi as a spiritual spokesperson, nor should her work be considered prophetic. However, there is an undeniable internal and contemplative aura within her work that resonates with our human desire for and pursuit toward something “higher”. 

  

“Aspiration”

Flameworked and Painted Borosilicate Glass

H: 130”, W: 28”, D: 3.5”

2007

(Source: choiglass.com)

As an Introduction…

This space is really meant to serve as a venue to showcase writings I’ve done in the past…not only on my own work and practice, but mostly unbiased pieces analyzing exhibitions or the embodiment of the artistic efforts of others.  As a practicing artist, I take great pleasure in the creative activities involving imagination and innovation through the process of making.  My website at davidschnuckel.com is the venue that showcases those efforts.  However, as an aspiring writer, I take great pleasure in the creative activities of observation, consideration, and assessment.  I’ve decided to set up a space online here that showcases those efforts, too.

As you’ll notice along the way, I’m not a professional writer…nor have I had any specific training in the craft.  I am simply a fan of language and an advocate for clarity, taking pleasure in the challenge of attempting to articulate that which intellectually, poetically, and/or imaginatively overwhelms me.  Writing has proven to be an informative activity in my development as an artist.  It has proven to be a provocative tool in my efforts as a budding instructor.  But most importantly, it has proven to be a fruitful hobby bringing much fulfillment and insight into the human experience in general.  In short, I don’t know much about it other than that like what it does for me…therefore, this blog and these short essays exist.

Each submission will consist of a written piece I have done in the past and a small blurb introducing the context of that particular writing.  In some of the pieces, the narrative adds a peculiar element of intrigue to the writing that wouldn’t necessarily be picked up on within its initial content. I’d like to think this place could be somewhat equivalent to the “Commentary” option of a DVD rental…that these posts could offer a glimpse at the story behind the story.  However, this space also provides an impetus to write more and without obligation on my own practice or the work of others.  I can’t provide any sort of time-based commitment in terms of entries submitted, but I foresee small dialogues popping up along the way in response to the commentary or criticism of any followers that may jump on board.  

I should warn all that I can’t promise that each submission will be fantastic.  I can only promise that I’ll keep posting.  And, yes, it also serves as a threat…

(Source: davidschnuckel.com)